Human Rights Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

Human Rights - Research Paper ExampleWe do sense that an indispensable minimum is required for such an existence. If we chose to set our minds to it by cooperating and do it a priority we feel with some confidence that such unnecessary deprivation could be overcome. And yet profound injustices on a staggering planetary scale remain. Continuing theoretical confusion and disagreement serves as a barrier for the human being rights project. Nussbaum has advanced the capabilities approach as a non-rights alternative. The capabilities approach focuses on what beings atomic number 18 actually able to do and be, their capability to function, and is an influential approach to quality of look measurement that increasingly features in international debate. A capabilities focus was unified into the United Nations Human Development Reports in 1993, largely under the influence of economist, philosopher, and Nobel laureate Amartya Sen. Nussbaums own pioneering work initially adopted the langu age and notion of human capability and functioning independently through her study of Aristotle. Nussbaum has since fused her project with that of Sens into a theoretical framework at once grounded in ancient thoughts and pertinent to development of contemporary public policy (Crocker 585). This paper explores the ways in which Nussbaums theory is not only compatible with but also enriching of rights. The Concept of Capabilities A different language about peoples staple fiber entitlements and justified claims has emerged in recent years focused on human capability and human functioning. Capability concerns the granting immunity to function in certain ways deemed valuable, involving particular powers and opportunities. Functioning is the actual choosing and doing of these valued things. Conceptually, this language of peoples capabilities refers to their abilities to do and to be certain things deemed valuable (Nussbaum Capabilities and Human Rights 119). The idea behind Nussbaum s capabilities approach is that there are certain functions people should be empowered to do which are understood to constitute a human life. A life developed and shaped by the choosing and doing of a range of these functions demarcates a dignified or true life from one that is stifled or oppressed (Nussbaum 71-72). Thus, Nussbaum conceives capabilities as a persons valuable powers or faculties that eject and should be realized in valuable functionings (Crocker 599). A minimally good life involves recognition of the dignity of that life by empowering it with genuine opportunities to function. In principle a human life is an end in itself. Empowering someone and/or safeguarding an environment in which someone can live a dignified or true human life upholds this principle. Nussbaums foundational principle of each person as end can thus be restated as the principle of each persons capabilities. Those capabilities necessary for a dignified life constitute universal moral values (Nussb aum 74). Nussbaums Methodology The central question of Nussbaums philosophy asks, What are people actually able to do and to be? Answers to this question enable us to draw out a notion of what capabilities we think people pauperisation to be able to choose and achieve in order to function and flourish in a dignified manner. Put another way, the list of basic capabilities is generated by asking a question that from the start is evaluative What activities